Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Administrația Națională „Apele Române”Administrația Națională „Apele Române”
VS
I work for NSWI work for NSW
Administrația Națională „Apele Române”

Administrația Națională „Apele Române”

Strada Edgar Quinet, Sector 1, 010018, RO

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
https://www.rowater.ro
642/1000Poor

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:58
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
I work for NSW

I work for NSW

Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://iworkfor.nsw.gov.au/
795/1000Fair

The NSW public sector includes ten departments and many agencies and organisations working together to develop policy and deliver important services such as health, education, housing, transport and infrastructure across NSW. We are over 300,000 dedicated people who sh...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:63,341
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Administrația Națională „Apele Române”

Administrația Națională „Apele Române”

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
I work for NSW

I work for NSW

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Administrația Națională „Apele Române” in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for I work for NSW in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Administrația Națională „Apele Române” (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Administrația Națională „Apele Române” cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - I work for NSW (X = Date, Y = Severity)

I work for NSW cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Administrația Națională „Apele Române”

Administrația Națională „Apele Române”

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
APE1766599000
I work for NSW

I work for NSW

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company and I work for NSW company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company and I work for NSW company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company and I work for NSW company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company and I work for NSW company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company and I work for NSW company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” company and I work for NSW company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” and I work for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” and I work for NSW, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Administrația Națională „Apele Române” or I work for NSW ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Administrația Națională „Apele Române” or I work for NSW ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” and I work for NSW, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Administrația Națională „Apele Române” and I work for NSW, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58523
SUMMARY

Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-14617
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-58597
SUMMARY

Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58524
SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-58522
SUMMARY

Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-03
UPDATED
Date2026-07-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5