Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AP Workflow SolutionsAP Workflow Solutions
VS
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaABertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA
AP Workflow Solutions

AP Workflow Solutions

200 Liberty St, New York, 10281, US

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://workflow.ap.org
754/1000Fair

We are AP Workflow Solutions trusted by global newsrooms to simplify complex storytelling. Born from journalism, we build newsroom-native tech that removes friction across platforms. Our tools respect deadlines, maintain integrity, and let newsrooms focus on what matt...

NAICS:51211
NAICS Definition:Motion Picture and Video Production
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Carl-Bertelsmann-Straße 270, Gütersloh, 33311, DE

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
779/1000Fair

Bertelsmann ist ein Medien-, Dienstleistungs- und Bildungsunternehmen mit rund 75.000 Mitarbeitenden, das in gut 50 Ländern der Welt aktiv ist. Zum Konzernverbund gehören das Entertainment-Unternehmen RTL Group, die Buchverlagsgruppe Penguin Random House, das Musikunter...

NAICS:51211
NAICS Definition:Motion Picture and Video Production
Employees:20,317
Subsidiaries:39
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AP Workflow Solutions

AP Workflow Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AP Workflow Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Media Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AP Workflow Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AP Workflow Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AP Workflow Solutions

AP Workflow Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AP Workflow Solutions company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions company and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AP Workflow Solutions or Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AP Workflow Solutions or Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AP Workflow Solutions and Bertelsmann SE & Co. KGaA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-58281
SUMMARY

Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-10660
SUMMARY

The Bluetooth BAP Broadcast Assistant GATT client in subsys/bluetooth/audio/bap_broadcast_assistant.c reassembled remote Broadcast Receive State data into a single file-static net_buf_simple (att_buf, BT_ATT_MAX_ATTRIBUTE_LEN = 512 bytes) shared by all connection instances, while the BUSY flag, long-read handle, and reset/offset state were per-connection. When the device acts as a Broadcast Assistant connected to multiple Scan Delegator peripherals, notification and long-read callbacks from different connections interleave on the shared buffer: the append in notify_handler (net_buf_simple_add_mem at the not-busy branch) performs no tailroom check, so receive-state notifications from two or more delegators accumulate on the same 512-byte buffer and, with a sufficiently large configured ATT MTU (BT_L2CAP_TX_MTU up to 2000) and two-to-three concurrent connections, write past the buffer into adjacent .bss (net_buf_simple_add only asserts in debug builds). Even below the overflow threshold, one connection's net_buf_simple_reset zeroes the shared length while another connection's reassembly and GATT read offset are in flight, mixing one peer's data into another's parse. A malicious or compromised Scan Delegator (or two colluding peers) over BLE can trigger this, causing out-of-bounds writes (memory corruption / denial of service) and cross-connection data corruption. The fix moves the buffer into the per-connection instance struct so each connection reassembles into its own buffer. Affects Zephyr releases shipping the Broadcast Assistant with the shared buffer, including v4.4.0 and earlier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-61870
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the VIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures by processing specially crafted VIFF images to exhaust available memory and cause denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 2.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 2.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.4
CVE-2026-61861
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a use-after-free vulnerability in the FormatMagickCaption method when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger memory allocation failures to cause a dangling pointer to reference freed memory, potentially enabling denial of service or code execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-61858
SUMMARY

ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in the APNG encoder and external delegates due to missing validation checks. Attackers can write files to disallowed paths by bypassing configured policy restrictions through the APNG encoding process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-11
UPDATED
Date2026-07-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8