Comparison Overview
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP
55, Boulevard Diderot, Paris, 75012, FR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
AP-HP (Greater Paris University Hospitals) is a European world-renowned university hospital. Its 39 hospitals treat 8 million people every year: in consultation, emergency, during scheduled or home hospitalizations. The AP-HP provides a public health service for everyo...

St. Luke's University Health Network
801 Ostrum Street, Bethlehem, 18015, US
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Founded in 1872, St. Luke’s University Health Network (SLUHN) is a fully integrated, regional, non-profit network of more than 23,000 employees providing services at 16 campuses and 350+ outpatient sites. With annual net revenue of $4 billion, the Network’s service area...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP







St. Luke's University Health Network






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP in 2026.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for St. Luke's University Health Network in 2026.
Incident History - Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - St. Luke's University Health Network (X = Date, Y = Severity)
St. Luke's University Health Network cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Greater Paris University Hospitals - AP-HP

St. Luke's University Health Network
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, a shared-agent editor can delete file records through `DELETE /api/files` that the owner has reused across multiple agents. The deletion removes the file globally — not just from the shared agent — breaking the owner's other private agents that reference the same `file_id`. The private agent retains a stale `file_id` reference that no longer resolves. A shared-agent editor can destroy files that the owner uses across multiple agents. The owner's private agents — which the attacker has no access to — break silently with stale `file_id` references. This is a cross-agent integrity violation: editing access to one agent should not affect another. Version 0.8.4 contains a patch.
LibreChat is an enhanced ChatGPT clone that supports multiple AI providers. In versions up to and including 0.8.3, users with only `VIEW` access to an MCP server can retrieve the server's decrypted admin-managed secrets through `GET /api/mcp/servers` and `GET /api/mcp/servers/:serverName`. The returned config includes plaintext values for `apiKey.key` and `oauth.client_secret`. This allows viewers of a shared MCP server to exfiltrate the underlying provider credentials. Version 0.8..4 contains a patch. Other remediations include: never returning decrypted admin-managed secrets to non-owners; redacting apiKey.key and oauth.client_secret from all API responses consider returning only boolean presence indicators for secrets, similar to the auth-values route pattern; and, if owners need to edit configs without re-entering secrets, preserving secrets server-side and returning placeholders instead of plaintext.
When returning errors, functions in the net/textproto package would include its input as part of the error. This might allow an attacker to inject misleading content to errors that are printed or logged.
Decoding a maliciously-crafted MIME header containing many invalid encoded-words can consume excessive CPU.
alf.io is an open source ticket reservation system for conferences, trade shows, workshops, and meetups. Prior to version 2.0-M5-2606, the alf.io extension sandbox injects a fully-functional HTTP client (`simpleHttpClient`) into every extension script's scope. The `postFileAndSaveResponse()` method accepts an arbitrary filesystem path as its `file` parameter and reads the file contents using `new FileInputStream(file)` with no path validation, directory restriction, or allowlist. A malicious extension script can read any file accessible to the JVM process user and exfiltrate it to an attacker-controlled server via HTTP POST. Version 2.0-M5-2606 patches the issue.