Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)
VS
S&P GlobalS&P Global
Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)

Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)

Metropolitan Building, James Joyce Street, Dublin, Krakow, Singapore, Dublin, IE, D1

Last Update: 06/03/2026

View Profile
756/1000Fair

Established in 2008, the Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) is the cornerstone of Aon’s global investment in analytics. Our teams located across Dublin, Krakow and Singapore, deliver data-driven insights that reduce the volatility our clients face and help t...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:291
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
S&P Global

S&P Global

55 Water Street, New York, 10041, US

Last Update: 09/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.spglobal.com
791/1000Fair

S&P Global (NYSE: SPGI) enables businesses, governments, and individuals with trusted data, expertise and technology to make decisions with conviction. We are Advancing Essential Intelligence through world-leading benchmarks, data, and insights that customers need in or...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:40,696
Subsidiaries:25
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)

Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
S&P Global

S&P Global

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

S&P Global has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - S&P Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

S&P Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)

Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
S&P Global

S&P Global

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LITSPGGUECHE1777407909

FAQ

Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) company and S&P Global company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) company and S&P Global company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) company and S&P Global company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) company and S&P Global company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) company and S&P Global company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) company and S&P Global company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) and S&P Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) and S&P Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) or S&P Global ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) or S&P Global ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) and S&P Global, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) and S&P Global, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8