Comparison Overview
Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)
Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)
Metropolitan Building, James Joyce Street, Dublin, Krakow, Singapore, Dublin, IE, D1
Last Update: 06/03/2026
Established in 2008, the Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) is the cornerstone of Aon’s global investment in analytics. Our teams located across Dublin, Krakow and Singapore, deliver data-driven insights that reduce the volatility our clients face and help t...
Lloyds Banking Group
25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN, GB
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Our purpose is Helping Britain Prosper. We do this by creating a more sustainable and inclusive future for people and businesses, shaping finance as a force for good. We're part of an ever-changing industry and are currently on a journey to shape the financial services...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)
Lloyds Banking Group
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Lloyds Banking Group has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lloyds Banking Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lloyds Banking Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Aon Centre for Innovation and Analytics (ACIA)
Lloyds Banking Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.