Comparison Overview

Aon

VS

BB&T

Aon

122 Leadenhall Street, London, undefined, EC3V 4AN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aon.com

We exist to shape decisions for the better — to protect and enrich the lives of people around the world. Through actionable analytic insight, globally integrated Risk Capital and Human Capital expertise, and locally relevant solutions, our colleagues provide clients in over 120 countries with the clarity and confidence to make better risk and people decisions that help protect and grow their businesses.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 75,543
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3
View Profile

BB&T

214 North Tryon Street, Charlotte, NC, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bbt.com

We’d love to stay connected with you! Please follow our Truist company page and unfollow this page which is no longer active. BB&T and SunTrust formed Truist with a shared purpose—to inspire and build better lives and communities. With our combined resources, collective passion, and commitment to innovation, we’re creating a better financial experience to help people and businesses achieve more. With 275 years of combined BB&T and SunTrust history, Truist serves approximately 12 million households with leading market share in many high growth markets in the country. The company offers a wide range of services including retail, small business and commercial banking; asset management; capital markets; commercial real estate; corporate and institutional banking; insurance; mortgage; payments; specialized lending; and wealth management. Headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, Truist is the sixth-largest commercial bank in the U.S. Truist Bank, Member FDIC. Learn more at Truist.com and see social media terms and conditions at Truist.com/SocialTerms.

NAICS: 52
NAICS Definition: Finance and Insurance
Employees: 13,573
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aon.jpeg
Aon
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bb&t.jpeg
BB&T
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Aon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
BB&T
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aon in 2025.

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for BB&T in 2025.

Incident History — Aon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — BB&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BB&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aon.jpeg
Aon
Incidents

Date Detected: 07/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: SQL Injection
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bb&t.jpeg
BB&T
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

BB&T company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Aon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Aon company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas BB&T company has not reported any.

In the current year, BB&T company and Aon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither BB&T company nor Aon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Aon company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other BB&T company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Aon company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while BB&T company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Aon company nor BB&T company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Aon nor BB&T holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Aon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to BB&T company.

Aon company employs more people globally than BB&T company, reflecting its scale as a Financial Services.

Neither Aon nor BB&T holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Aon nor BB&T holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Aon nor BB&T holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Aon nor BB&T holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Aon nor BB&T holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Aon nor BB&T holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References