Comparison Overview
Aon Affinity Travel Practice

Aon Affinity Travel Practice
900 Stewart Avenue, Garden City, NY, 11530, US
Last Update: 19/01/2026
Aon is in the Business of Better Decisions We shape decisions for the better — to protect and enrich the lives of people around the world. We believe that businesses thrive when the communities they serve and the people they employ also flourish. Our culture enables us...

Aviva
80 Fenchurch Street, London, EC3M 4AE, , GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
💛 We're a leading Insurance, Wealth & Retirement business. 📣 Follow for #LifeAtAviva. Aviva is nothing without our people. Living up to our purpose to be with you today for a better tomorrow applies to those we work with just as much as it does to our custom...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Aon Affinity Travel Practice







Aviva






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aon Affinity Travel Practice in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Aviva in 2026.
Incident History - Aon Affinity Travel Practice (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aon Affinity Travel Practice cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Aviva (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aviva cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Aon Affinity Travel Practice

Aviva
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.