Comparison Overview

AnyDesk Software

VS

Atlassian

AnyDesk Software

Türlenstraße 2, Stuttgart, Baden-Württemberg, 70191, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 650 and 699

AnyDesk was founded in Germany in 2014. Its unique remote access software has been downloaded by more than 800 million times by users worldwide. The software is based on the company’s unique proprietary codec, DeskRT, that allows for virtually latency-free collaboration whether you’re down the hall or on the other side of the world. AnyDesk is one of the 50 fastest-growing businesses in Germany and its technology is trusted by millions of people and more than 180,000 customers in 190 countries, including world-renowned Fortune 500 brands.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 653
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Atlassian

Level 6/341 George St, Sydney, NSW, 2000, AU
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Atlassian powers the collaboration that helps teams accomplish what would otherwise be impossible alone. From space missions and motor racing to bugs in code and IT requests, no task is too large or too small with the right team, the right tools, and the right practices. Over 300,000 global companies and 80% of the Fortune 500 rely on Atlassian’s software, like Jira, Confluence, Loom, and Trello, to help their teams work better together and deliver quality results on time. With our 300,000+ customers and team of 10,000+ Atlassians, we are building the next generation of team collaboration and productivity software. We believe the power of teams has the potential to change the world—one that is more open, authentic, and inclusive.

NAICS: 5112
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 17,274
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anydesk-software-gmbh.jpeg
AnyDesk Software
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlassian.jpeg
Atlassian
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AnyDesk Software
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlassian
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AnyDesk Software in 2025.

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlassian in 2025.

Incident History — AnyDesk Software (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AnyDesk Software cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlassian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlassian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anydesk-software-gmbh.jpeg
AnyDesk Software
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Remote Access Exploitation
Motivation: Data Exfiltration
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlassian.jpeg
Atlassian
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2023
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Template Injection Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 02/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Stolen Login Credentials
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Atlassian company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AnyDesk Software company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Atlassian company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to AnyDesk Software company.

In the current year, Atlassian company and AnyDesk Software company have not reported any cyber incidents.

AnyDesk Software company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Atlassian company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Atlassian company nor AnyDesk Software company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atlassian company nor AnyDesk Software company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Atlassian company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while AnyDesk Software company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AnyDesk Software nor Atlassian holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Atlassian company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to AnyDesk Software company.

Atlassian company employs more people globally than AnyDesk Software company, reflecting its scale as a Software Development.

Neither AnyDesk Software nor Atlassian holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AnyDesk Software nor Atlassian holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AnyDesk Software nor Atlassian holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AnyDesk Software nor Atlassian holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AnyDesk Software nor Atlassian holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AnyDesk Software nor Atlassian holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A weakness has been identified in codingWithElias School Management System up to f1ac334bfd89ae9067cc14dea12ec6ff3f078c01. Affected is an unknown function of the file /student-view.php of the component Edit Student Info Page. This manipulation of the argument First Name causes cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product follows a rolling release approach for continuous delivery, so version details for affected or updated releases are not provided. Other parameters might be affected as well. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 3.3
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

By providing a command-line argument starting with a semi-colon ; to an API endpoint created by the EnhancedCommandExecutor class of the HexStrike AI MCP server, the resultant composed command is executed directly in the context of the MCP server’s normal privilege; typically, this is root. There is no attempt to sanitize these arguments in the default configuration of this MCP server at the affected version (as of commit 2f3a5512 in September of 2025).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

A weakness has been identified in winston-dsouza Ecommerce-Website up to 87734c043269baac0b4cfe9664784462138b1b2e. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file /includes/header_menu.php of the component GET Parameter Handler. Executing manipulation of the argument Error can lead to cross site scripting. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. This product implements a rolling release for ongoing delivery, which means version information for affected or updated releases is unavailable. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Qualitor 8.20/8.24. Affected by this vulnerability is the function eval of the file /html/st/stdeslocamento/request/getResumo.php. Performing manipulation of the argument passageiros results in code injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Scada-LTS up to 2.7.8.1. Affected is the function Common.getHomeDir of the file br/org/scadabr/vo/exporter/ZIPProjectManager.java of the component Project Import. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X