Comparison Overview
ANU Centre for Mental Health Research

ANU Centre for Mental Health Research
63 Eggleston Rd, Acton, 2601, AU
Last Update: 24/12/2025
The Centre for Mental Health Research (CMHR) is part of the Australian National University's Research School of Population Health. It aims to improve the mental health of Australians through research, education, and collaborating with health policy and decision makers a...

PPD
168 3rd Ave, Waltham, 02451, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The PPD™ clinical research business of Thermo Fisher Scientific, the world leader in serving science, enables customers to accelerate innovation and drug development through patient-centered strategies and data analytics. Our services, which span multiple therapeutic ar...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ANU Centre for Mental Health Research







PPD






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ANU Centre for Mental Health Research in 2026.
Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PPD in 2026.
Incident History - ANU Centre for Mental Health Research (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ANU Centre for Mental Health Research cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PPD (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PPD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ANU Centre for Mental Health Research

PPD
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.