Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AMETEK MRO AntaviaAMETEK MRO Antavia
VS
Pratt & WhitneyPratt & Whitney
AMETEK MRO Antavia

AMETEK MRO Antavia

ZAC Grand Sud Logistique , Campsas, 82370, FR

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.antavia.com/
746/1000Moderate

AMETEK MRO ANTAVIA is more than your PART145 MRO provider, we aim to become your trusted partner by staying close to our customer and understand your needs: that’s how we define our global strategic network. We place the flexibility and responsiveness of a human-size co...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:106
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

400 Main Street, East Hartford, CT, US, 06108

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

Pratt & Whitney, an RTX business, is a global leader in propulsion systems, powering the most advanced aircraft in the world, and we are shaping the future of aviation. Our engines help connect people, grow economies and defend freedom. Our customers depend on us to get...

NAICS:3364
NAICS Definition:Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees:29,731
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AMETEK MRO Antavia

AMETEK MRO Antavia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AMETEK MRO Antavia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pratt & Whitney in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AMETEK MRO Antavia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMETEK MRO Antavia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Pratt & Whitney (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pratt & Whitney cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AMETEK MRO Antavia

AMETEK MRO Antavia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Pratt & Whitney

Pratt & Whitney

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
PRA133082125

FAQ

Between AMETEK MRO Antavia company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia company and Pratt & Whitney company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia and Pratt & Whitney, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia and Pratt & Whitney, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AMETEK MRO Antavia or Pratt & Whitney ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AMETEK MRO Antavia or Pratt & Whitney ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia and Pratt & Whitney, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AMETEK MRO Antavia and Pratt & Whitney, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3