Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AnsellAnsell
VS
Colgate-PalmoliveColgate-Palmolive
Ansell

Ansell

678 Victoria Street, Richmond, VIC, AU, 3121

Last Update: 11/05/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.ansell.com
724/1000Moderate

Ansell is a global leader in safety solutions and an integrated manufacturer of personal protective equipment (PPE), with a vision of leading the world to a safer future. Each day, our workforce of over 15,000 people across more than 100 countries designs, manufactures...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:4,829
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Colgate-Palmolive

Colgate-Palmolive

300 Park Ave, New York, New York, US, 10022

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
825/1000Good

Make More Smiles. We are Colgate-Palmolive, a caring, innovative growth company that is reimagining a healthier future for all people, their pets and our planet. For over 200 years, we've poured our care into creating a future where everyone has more reasons to smile. C...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:30,125
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ansell

Ansell

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Colgate-Palmolive

Colgate-Palmolive

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ansell in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Colgate-Palmolive in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ansell (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ansell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Colgate-Palmolive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Colgate-Palmolive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ansell

Ansell

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ANS1773268490
Colgate-Palmolive

Colgate-Palmolive

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ansell company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ansell company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ansell company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ansell company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ansell company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ansell company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ansell company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ansell company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ansell company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ansell company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ansell company and Colgate-Palmolive company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ansell and Colgate-Palmolive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ansell and Colgate-Palmolive, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ansell or Colgate-Palmolive ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ansell or Colgate-Palmolive ?
Between Ansell and Colgate-Palmolive, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ansell and Colgate-Palmolive, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA