Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Anne Arundel DermatologyAnne Arundel Dermatology
VS
Mass General BrighamMass General Brigham
Anne Arundel Dermatology

Anne Arundel Dermatology

25 Crossroads Dr, Owings Mills, 21117, US

Last Update: 11/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://aadermatology.com
512/1000Critical

At Anne Arundel Dermatology, we give exceptional care - to our patients and to each other. We have been a trusted leader in skin health for more than 50 years, offering comprehensive medical, pediatric, surgical, and aesthetic dermatology services throughout the Mid-Atl...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:576
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Mass General Brigham

Mass General Brigham

399 Revolution Dr, Somerville, 02145, US

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
743/1000Moderate

Mass General Brigham is an integrated academic health care system, uniting great minds to solve the hardest problems in medicine for our communities and the world. Mass General Brigham connects a full continuum of care across a system of academic medical centers, commun...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:18,417
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Anne Arundel Dermatology

Anne Arundel Dermatology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mass General Brigham

Mass General Brigham

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Anne Arundel Dermatology has 29.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mass General Brigham in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Anne Arundel Dermatology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anne Arundel Dermatology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mass General Brigham (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mass General Brigham cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Anne Arundel Dermatology

Anne Arundel Dermatology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ANN1775867299
🔒 Incident : Breach
ANN1772217469
Mass General Brigham

Mass General Brigham

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS548072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
MAS844072325

FAQ

Between Anne Arundel Dermatology company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology company and Mass General Brigham company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology company and Mass General Brigham company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology company and Mass General Brigham company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology and Mass General Brigham, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology and Mass General Brigham, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Anne Arundel Dermatology or Mass General Brigham ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Anne Arundel Dermatology or Mass General Brigham ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology and Mass General Brigham, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Anne Arundel Dermatology and Mass General Brigham, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89322
SUMMARY

Vault and Vault Enterprise did not consistently evaluate ACL policies against the canonical form of resource and policy names. This may allow an authenticated user with delegated permissions to bypass an explicit deny restriction and access a protected resource or assign a denied policy, potentially leading to privilege escalation. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-89322) is fixed in Vault Community Edition 2.1.2, and Vault Enterprise 2.1.2, 1.21.12, 1.20.17, and 1.19.23.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-107314
SUMMARY

pgjdbc, the PostgreSQL JDBC Driver, versions 42.7.11 through 42.7.13 enforce no restriction when the requireAuth connection property excludes all six authentication methods the driver knows, for example requireAuth=!password,!md5,!gss,!sspi,!scram-sha-256,!none. The driver then accepts any method the server asks for, including cleartext password authentication. A value without a method in it, such as requireAuth=, (a single comma), is affected the same way. An attacker positioned between the application and its server can ask for cleartext password authentication and receive the database password. A positive list such as requireAuth=scram-sha-256, and a partial exclusion such as requireAuth=!password,!md5, are enforced correctly. The property has no default value, so a deployment that does not set it is not affected. 42.7.14 fixes the problem: such a connection is refused with SQLState 08004, and a value without a method in it is rejected as invalid.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107285
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, a proxied ws request is carried through CONNECT, but NettyRequestFactory.newNettyRequest and requestUri decide whether to attach proxy authentication and an absolute-form target only from whether the URI is secure. Because ws is not marked secure, the tunneled WebSocket upgrade sent to the origin includes the proxy's Proxy-Authorization value. Basic credentials are directly recoverable and Digest responses can be replayed or cracked offline. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107284
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, WebSocketHandler.upgrade aborts a handshake whose Sec-WebSocket-Accept value is missing or invalid but continues into pipeline installation and onOpen delivery. Frames coalesced with the invalid 101 response can be decoded and delivered from a peer that did not prove the handshake, although the request future fails and the channel closes. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-107283
SUMMARY

The AsyncHttpClient (AHC) library allows Java applications to easily execute HTTP requests and asynchronously process HTTP responses. Prior to 3.0.12 and 2.16.1, Realm.Builder generates the HTTP Digest client nonce with ThreadLocalRandom rather than a cryptographically secure random source. Digest relies on an unpredictable cnonce to resist chosen-plaintext and credential precomputation attacks, so an observer able to infer generator state can reduce the protection of the authentication exchange. This issue is fixed in versions 3.0.12 and 2.16.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-07
UPDATED
Date2026-10-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2