Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Ankur- BPCL Startup InitiativeAnkur- BPCL Startup Initiative
VS
Bharat Petroleum Corporation LimitedBharat Petroleum Corporation Limited
Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative

Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative

Mumbai, 400001, IN

Last Update: 12/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://startup.bpcl.in
745/1000Moderate

In 2016, BPCL added a new chapter to its illustrious history of energizing the nation by launching its startup initiative “Ankur”. Conceived as a part of the Startup India initiative of the Government of India, Ankur represents a beacon of the new innovation revolution....

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Mumbai, IN

Last Update: 07/09/2026

View Profile
779/1000Fair

Fortune Global 500 Company, Bharat Petroleum is the second largest Indian Oil Marketing Company and one of the premier integrated energy companies in India, engaged in refining of crude oil and marketing of petroleum products, with a significant presence in the upstream...

NAICS:211
NAICS Definition:Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees:23,715
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative

Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative

Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative company and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative company and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative company and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative company and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative company and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative company and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative company and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative company and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative company and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative company and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative company and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative or Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative or Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Ankur- BPCL Startup Initiative and Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA