Comparison Overview
ANDRITZ Technologies - India

ANDRITZ Technologies - India
Andritz Technologies Private Ltd., The Lords, Block - I, Plot No. 1 &2,(NP), III Floor, Thiru-Vi-Ka Industrial Estate, Jawaharlal Nehru Road, Ekkatuthangal, Guindy, Chennai, 600032, IN
Last Update: 19/03/2026
ANDRITZ Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (ATPL) in India, came into presence with the establishment of Metals division in Bangalore in 1998, marking ANDRITZ's inaugural presence in the country. Over time, the organization expanded with the introduction of the Pulp and Paper divis...

Saipem
Via Luigi Russolo, 5, Milan, 20138, IT
Last Update: 30/03/2026
Saipem is a global leader in the engineering and construction of major projects for the energy and infrastructure sectors, both offshore and onshore. Saipem is “One Company” organized into business lines: Asset Based Services, Drilling, Energy Carriers, Offshore Wind, S...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ANDRITZ Technologies - India







Saipem






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ANDRITZ Technologies - India in 2026.
Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Saipem in 2026.
Incident History - ANDRITZ Technologies - India (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ANDRITZ Technologies - India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Saipem (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Saipem cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ANDRITZ Technologies - India

Saipem
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.