Comparison Overview
ANDRITZ Separation

ANDRITZ Separation
Stattegger Straße 18, Graz, 8045, AT
Last Update: 02/04/2026
A WORLD OF SEPARATION SOLUTIONS. ANDRITZ provides mechanical and thermal solid/liquid separation technologies, complemented by comprehensive services, automation, and digitalization solutions for the chemicals, environment, food and beverage, as well as mining and mine...

Murugappa Group
"Dare House" 234, N S C Bose Road, Chennai, 600001, IN
Last Update: 23/09/2026
About Murugappa Group A 125-year-old conglomerate with presence across India and the world, the INR 902 billion (90,178 crore) Murugappa Group has diverse businesses in agriculture, engineering, financial services and more. The Group has 10 listed companies: Carboru...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ANDRITZ Separation







Murugappa Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ANDRITZ Separation in 2026.
Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Murugappa Group in 2026.
Incident History - ANDRITZ Separation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ANDRITZ Separation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Murugappa Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Murugappa Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ANDRITZ Separation

Murugappa Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.