Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ANDRITZ PumpsANDRITZ Pumps
VS
Caterpillar Inc.Caterpillar Inc.
ANDRITZ Pumps

ANDRITZ Pumps

Stattegger Straße 18, Graz, 8045, AT

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
741/1000Moderate

The internationally renowned ANDRITZ GROUP has been building pumps for more than 165 years. We offer innovative and customized solutions with pumps and complete pumping stations for various industries such as water and waste water management, pulp and paper, food appli...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Caterpillar Inc.

Caterpillar Inc.

Irving, Texas, US

Last Update: 28/06/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.caterpillar.com
831/1000Good

For 100 years, we’ve been helping customers build a better, more sustainable world. Our innovative products and services, backed by our global dealer network, provide exceptional value that helps customers succeed. With 2024 sales and revenues of $64.8 billion, Caterp...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:61,410
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ANDRITZ Pumps

ANDRITZ Pumps

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Caterpillar Inc.

Caterpillar Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ANDRITZ Pumps in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caterpillar Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ANDRITZ Pumps (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ANDRITZ Pumps cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Caterpillar Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caterpillar Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ANDRITZ Pumps

ANDRITZ Pumps

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Caterpillar Inc.

Caterpillar Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ANDRITZ Pumps company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps company and Caterpillar Inc. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps and Caterpillar Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps and Caterpillar Inc., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ANDRITZ Pumps or Caterpillar Inc. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ANDRITZ Pumps or Caterpillar Inc. ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps and Caterpillar Inc., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ANDRITZ Pumps and Caterpillar Inc., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA