Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ANDRITZ Hydropower AustraliaANDRITZ Hydropower Australia
VS
VestasVestas
ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia

ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia

3 Spring St, Sydney, 2000, AU

Last Update: 17/03/2026

View Profile
788/1000Fair

From the historic pioneers of technology to a modern global market leader. ANDRITZ Hydropower is one of the world's leading suppliers of electromechanical equipment and services for hydropower stations in the dynamically growing global renewable energy market. Based on...

NAICS:33362
NAICS Definition:Engines and Power Transmission Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:5
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Vestas

Vestas

Hedeager 42, Aarhus, DK, 8200

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vestas.com/
761/1000Fair

Vestas is the energy industry’s global partner on sustainable energy solutions. We design, manufacture, install, and service wind turbines across the globe, and with +200 GW of wind turbines in 88 countries, we have installed more wind power than anyone else. Through o...

NAICS:33362
NAICS Definition:Engines and Power Transmission Equipment Manufacturing
Employees:31,845
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia

ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Vestas

Vestas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Renewable Energy Equipment Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Vestas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Vestas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Vestas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia

ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Vestas

Vestas

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
VESNOR1780527378
🔒 Incident : Breach
VES1152111122

FAQ

Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia company and Vestas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia company and Vestas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia company and Vestas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia company and Vestas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia company and Vestas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia company and Vestas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia company and Vestas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia company and Vestas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia company and Vestas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia company and Vestas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia company and Vestas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia and Vestas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia and Vestas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia or Vestas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia or Vestas ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia and Vestas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ANDRITZ Hydropower Australia and Vestas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2