Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Andover Eye Associates & GloMD » AND1767376038

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AND1767376038)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-54
Company Score Before Incident793 / 1000
Company Score After Incident739 / 1000
Company LinkView Andover Eye Associates & GloMD Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERAND1767376038
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTOREmail Compromise
DATA EXPOSEDNames, Social Security numbers
INCIDENT DATE27/05/2025
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Andover Eye Associates & GloMD's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Andover Eye Associates & GloMD Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Andover Eye Associates & GloMD breach identified under incident ID AND1767376038.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Andover Eye Associates & GloMD's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/andover-eye-associates-&-glomd, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Medical Practices and the number of employees: 3 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 793 and after the incident was 739 with a difference of -54 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Andover Eye Associates & GloMD and their customers.

On 31 December 2025, Andover Eye Associates disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Andover Eye Associates Data Breach".

Andover Eye Associates reported a data breach affecting the personal information of potentially thousands of individuals across the U.S., including at least 237 New Hampshire residents.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Employee email accounts, and exposing Names, Social Security numbers.

In response, and began remediation that includes Implemented additional safeguards, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification by mail to impacted individuals.

The case underscores how Completed, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Impacted individuals notified by mail.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including suspicious activity in two employee email accounts, and unauthorized actor accessed at least one account and Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (T1078.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating compromise of employee email accounts. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to employee email accounts (implied) and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating employee email accounts compromised (potential credential theft). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (T1114.002) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including unauthorized access to employee email accounts, and exposure of names and Social Security numbers. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating social Security numbers exposed (implied exfiltration). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (10%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of ransomware or encryption in incident, Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of data manipulation in incident, and Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exposure of PII (names, SSNs) aligns with data compromise. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References