Andersenec vs M%26t-bank - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Comparison Overview

Andersen in Ecuador

M&T Bank

Andersen in Ecuador

Edificio Mirage - Quito, Parque Empresarial Colón - Guayaquil, Ecuador, 090112, EC

Last Update: 17/02/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://ec.Andersen.com

755/1000Fair

Andersen in Ecuador is the result of the integration of FIDESBURó and PROFILE, two of the main legal and tax service firms in the country. Together, they combine their multidisciplinary teams of professionals, specialized in law and accounting. The Firm, with offices in...

NAICS:52

NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance

Employees:195

Subsidiaries:31

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

M&T Bank

345 Main St., Buffalo, 14203, US

Last Update: 22/04/2026

View Profile

Between 650 and 699

http://www.mtb.com

669/1000Weak

Great companies have an enduring sense of purpose. At M&T, our purpose is a simple one: make a difference in people’s lives and uplift the communities we serve. Founded in 1856 in Buffalo, NY we are now a top 11 full-service US-based commercial bank with a retail footpr...

NAICS:52

NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance

Employees:30,274

Subsidiaries:2

12-month incidents

Known data breaches

Attack type number

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Andersen in Ecuador

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

M&T Bank

ISO 27001Not verified

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

GDPRNot verified

PCI DSSNot verified

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Andersen in Ecuador in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

M&T Bank has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Andersen in Ecuador (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Andersen in Ecuador cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - M&T Bank (X = Date, Y = Severity)

M&T Bank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Andersen in Ecuador

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

M&T Bank

Incidents

🔒 Incident : Breach

M&TTHI1776869694

🔒 Incident : Breach

M&TLAW1776869766

FAQ

Between Andersen in Ecuador company and M&T Bank company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador company and M&T Bank company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador company and M&T Bank company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador company and M&T Bank company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador company and M&T Bank company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador company and M&T Bank company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador and M&T Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador and M&T Bank, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Andersen in Ecuador or M&T Bank ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Andersen in Ecuador or M&T Bank ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador and M&T Bank, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Andersen in Ecuador and M&T Bank, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-76929

SUMMARY

Pcapng file parser crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76928

SUMMARY

X.509IF protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76927

SUMMARY

H.245 protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

CVSS3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76926

SUMMARY

BUSMASTER file parser abnormal exit in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.1)

CVSS3

Base Score: 3.1

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

IMPACT SCORE

1.4

EXPLOITABILITY

1.6

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-76924

SUMMARY

Kerberos protocol dissector crash in 4.6.0 to 4.6.7 and 4.4.0 to 4.4.18 allows denial of service

PUBLISHED

Date2026-08-19

UPDATED

Date2026-08-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 5.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

1.8

REFERENCES