Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Anantara Vacation ClubAnantara Vacation Club
VS
Travel + Leisure Co.Travel + Leisure Co.
Anantara Vacation Club

Anantara Vacation Club

9th Floor, Unit 4 Riverside Plaza Building, Samrae, Thonburi, Bangkok, 10110, TH

Last Update: 12/03/2026

View Profile
777/1000Fair

Anantara Vacation Club is Asia’s premier vacation ownership programme, which provides Club Points Owners and their guests with the opportunity to explore top holiday destinations year after year.​ Through our flexible points-based programme, Points Owners can explore C...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:652
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Travel + Leisure Co.

Travel + Leisure Co.

6277 Sea Harbor Dr, Orlando, Florida, US, 32821

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
797/1000Fair

Travel + Leisure Co., the world's leading vacation ownership and membership travel company, provides more than six million vacations to travelers every year. The company’s extensive Vacation Ownership portfolio includes trusted and iconic vacation club brands with a com...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:14,631
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Anantara Vacation Club

Anantara Vacation Club

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Travel + Leisure Co.

Travel + Leisure Co.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anantara Vacation Club in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Travel + Leisure Co. in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Anantara Vacation Club (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anantara Vacation Club cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Travel + Leisure Co. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Travel + Leisure Co. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Anantara Vacation Club

Anantara Vacation Club

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Travel + Leisure Co.

Travel + Leisure Co.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Anantara Vacation Club company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club company and Travel + Leisure Co. company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club and Travel + Leisure Co., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club and Travel + Leisure Co., which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Anantara Vacation Club or Travel + Leisure Co. ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Anantara Vacation Club or Travel + Leisure Co. ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club and Travel + Leisure Co., which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Anantara Vacation Club and Travel + Leisure Co., which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1