Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区)安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区)
VS
Radisson Hotel GroupRadisson Hotel Group
安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区)

安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区)

N/A

Last Update: 01/03/2026

View Profile
773/1000Fair

安纳塔拉度假会是奢华产权共享服务业中的翘楚,在亚洲享誉盛名。安纳塔拉豪华度假会为拥有会籍的业主提供数以千计位于迷人国度的精选度假酒店,及其全球合作伙伴旗下的奢华酒店的别墅及套房。安纳塔拉度假会堪称高品质标准的典范。 在快速增长的经济环境中, 安纳塔拉度假会带领着市场不断创新和进步。2012年,安纳塔拉度假会在南亚项目中荣获“产权共享发展”奖以及“新业主系列”奖。 安纳塔拉度假会的母公司是泰国最大的酒店、零售和餐饮运营商——美诺(minor)国际集团。公司现在雇佣了超过25,000名的服务人员, 运营超过80家酒店、度假村和...

NAICS:721
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:34
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Radisson Hotel Group

Radisson Hotel Group

44 Avenue du Bourget, Brussels, B-1130, BE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
815/1000Good

Radisson Hotel Group is an international hotel group, operating in EMEA and APAC with over 1,320 hotels in operation and under development in +95 countries. The international hotel group is rapidly expanding with a plan to significantly grow the portfolio. The Group’s o...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:17,162
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区)

安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Radisson Hotel Group

Radisson Hotel Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Radisson Hotel Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Radisson Hotel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Radisson Hotel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区)

安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Radisson Hotel Group

Radisson Hotel Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) company and Radisson Hotel Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) and Radisson Hotel Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) and Radisson Hotel Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) or Radisson Hotel Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) or Radisson Hotel Group ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) and Radisson Hotel Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between 安纳塔拉度假会(大中华区) and Radisson Hotel Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1