Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau CandyAmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy
VS
NestléNestlé
AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy

AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy

3461 Ringsby Ct, Denver, 80216, US

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amusemints.com
760/1000Fair

AmuseMints has been a supplier of breath mints and candy to the souvenir, gift, and specialty markets since 2004. In 2016 AmuseMints merged with Nassau Candy. The company now specializes in candy, snacks, hard goods and apparel that can be customized for any state, re...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Nestlé

Nestlé

Av. Nestlé 55, Vevey, CH, 1800

Last Update: 06/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.nestle.com
844/1000Good

As the world’s largest food and beverage company we are driven by a simple aim: unlocking the power of food to enhance quality of life for everyone, today and for generations to come. To deliver on this, we serve with passion, with a spirit of excellence, offering produ...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:214,515
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy

AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Nestlé

Nestlé

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nestlé in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Nestlé (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nestlé cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy

AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Nestlé

Nestlé

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy company and Nestlé company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy company and Nestlé company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy company and Nestlé company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy company and Nestlé company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy company and Nestlé company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy company and Nestlé company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy and Nestlé, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy and Nestlé, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy or Nestlé ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy or Nestlé ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy and Nestlé, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AmuseMints Sweets & Snacks a Division of Nassau Candy and Nestlé, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8