Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AmtrakAmtrak
VS
TrenitaliaTrenitalia
Amtrak

Amtrak

1 Massachusetts Ave NW, Washington, 20002, US

Last Update: 17/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.amtrak.com
668/1000Weak

Moving America Where it wants to go. We are not just a railroad; we are a company that moves people. With 21,000 route miles in 46 states, the District of Columbia and three Canadian provinces, Amtrak operates more than 300 trains each day – at speeds up to 150 mph – t...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:13,811
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
1
Trenitalia

Trenitalia

Piazza della Croce Rossa n. 1, ROMA, IT, 00161

Last Update: 30/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.trenitalia.com
730/1000Moderate

Trenitalia, the Ferrovie dello Stato Group's company for the transportation of passengers and the provision of logistics services for goods, is one of Europe’s largest rail operators. Trenitalia's mission is to provide services, in a domestic and European context, able...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:10,235
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Amtrak

Amtrak

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Trenitalia

Trenitalia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Amtrak has 20.0% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Trenitalia has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Amtrak (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amtrak cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Trenitalia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trenitalia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Amtrak

Amtrak

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AMT1776407118
🔒 Incident : Breach
23A1764346412
🔒 Incident : Breach
AMT653080525
Trenitalia

Trenitalia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRE1782851855

FAQ

Between Amtrak company and Trenitalia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Amtrak company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Amtrak company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Amtrak company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Amtrak company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Amtrak company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Amtrak company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Amtrak company and Trenitalia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Amtrak company and Trenitalia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Amtrak company and Trenitalia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Amtrak company and Trenitalia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Amtrak and Trenitalia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Amtrak and Trenitalia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Amtrak or Trenitalia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Amtrak or Trenitalia ?
Between Amtrak and Trenitalia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Amtrak and Trenitalia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2