Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Amsterdam UMC FoundationAmsterdam UMC Foundation
VS
TED ConferencesTED Conferences
Amsterdam UMC Foundation

Amsterdam UMC Foundation

Postbus 7057, Amsterdam, undefined, 1007 MB, NL

Last Update: 15/02/2026

View Profile

Deze stichting werft financiële middelen voor veelbelovend innovatief wetenschappelijk onderzoek binnen Amsterdam UMC. Wij financieren onderzoek naar de zorg van morgen. Dit doen wij dankzij de steun van donateurs. Helpt u mee?

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11
Subsidiaries:14
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
TED Conferences

TED Conferences

330 Hudson Street, New York, 10013, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.TED.com
846/1000Good

TED’s mission is to discover and champion the ideas that will shape tomorrow. Powerful ideas, powerfully presented, can move us to feel something, to think differently, to take action and create a brighter future. TED finds these powerful ideas across disciplines and a...

NAICS:8135
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:15,408
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Amsterdam UMC Foundation

Amsterdam UMC Foundation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
TED Conferences

TED Conferences

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amsterdam UMC Foundation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Non-profit Organizations Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for TED Conferences in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Amsterdam UMC Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amsterdam UMC Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - TED Conferences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

TED Conferences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Amsterdam UMC Foundation

Amsterdam UMC Foundation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
TED Conferences

TED Conferences

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation company and TED Conferences company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation company and TED Conferences company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation company and TED Conferences company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation company and TED Conferences company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation company and TED Conferences company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation company and TED Conferences company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation and TED Conferences, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation and TED Conferences, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Amsterdam UMC Foundation or TED Conferences ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Amsterdam UMC Foundation or TED Conferences ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation and TED Conferences, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Amsterdam UMC Foundation and TED Conferences, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-44541
SUMMARY

Fides is an open-source privacy engineering platform. From version 2.33.0 to before version 2.84.5, there is a DOM-based XSS vulnerability in fides.js via the fides_description override. This issue has been patched in version 2.84.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49141
SUMMARY

WACRM prior to commit 73041bf contain an authorization bypass vulnerability in the automation engine that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify contacts belonging to other tenants by supplying an arbitrary caller-controlled contact_id in the POST request body without tenant ownership verification. Attackers can exploit the service-role client that bypasses row-level security to modify victim contact fields including name, email, and company across tenant boundaries using only a known contact UUID.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47345
SUMMARY

Namespace attributes are not encoded correctly during HTML serialization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47344
SUMMARY

When ALLOW_INSECURE_RAW_TEXT is enabled, whitespace-variant closing tags (e.g., </style\t>) are not recognized by the sanitizer but accepted by browsers as valid end tags, allowing subsequent content to escape sanitization. This allows bypassing the cross-site scripting prevention mechanism of typo3/html-sanitizer before version 2.3.2.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-46484
SUMMARY

Headplane is a feature-complete Web UI for Headscale. Prior to versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3, Headplane was vulnerable to a path traversal / authorization bypass in the Headscale API client used by node and user rename operations. This issue has been patched in versions 0.6.3 and 0.7.0-beta.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-08
UPDATED
Date2026-06-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8