Comparison Overview
Ampere Software Technology

Ampere Software Technology
122-122 bis avenue du Général Leclerc, Boulogne Billancourt, FR, 92 100
Last Update: 23/02/2026
We are Ampere Software Technology, an entity dedicated to software & systems engineering at Ampere, at the heart of the technological transformation of Renault Group. We develop the architecture for the vehicle of the future: the Software Defined Vehicle. An architectur...

JLR
Abbey Road, Coventry, CV3 4LF, GB
Last Update: 30/04/2026
At JLR, we create exceptional experiences through our brands: Range Rover, Defender, Discovery and Jaguar. As the corporate home of these iconic British brands, we bring together world-class design, pioneering innovation and the creative ambition that drives our busines...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Ampere Software Technology







JLR






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Ampere Software Technology in 2026.
Incidents vs Motor Vehicle Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
JLR has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Ampere Software Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Ampere Software Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - JLR (X = Date, Y = Severity)
JLR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Ampere Software Technology

JLR
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.