Comparison Overview
Amity University Raipur

Amity University Raipur
MANTH (KHARORA), State Highway 9, Raipur Baloda-Bazar Road, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, IN, 493225
Last Update: 27/03/2026
Amity University Chhattisgarh (Raipur) is a part of 20-year old, leading education group of India, set up with a vision to contribute to nation-building through education, where currently 150,000+ students are pursuing 250 programmes across campuses in India and abroad....

USP - Universidade de São Paulo
Rua da Reitoria, 109, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 05508-900
Last Update: 29/03/2026
A Universidade de São Paulo (USP) é uma universidade pública, mantida pelo Estado de São Paulo e ligada à Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Econômico, Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (SDECTI). O talento e dedicação dos docentes, alunos e funcionários têm sido reconhecidos po...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Amity University Raipur







USP - Universidade de São Paulo






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Amity University Raipur in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for USP - Universidade de São Paulo in 2026.
Incident History - Amity University Raipur (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Amity University Raipur cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - USP - Universidade de São Paulo (X = Date, Y = Severity)
USP - Universidade de São Paulo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Amity University Raipur

USP - Universidade de São Paulo
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability in GroupController::updatePermissions that allows GROUP_EDIT administrators to grant arbitrary rights to groups without verifying they hold those rights themselves. A delegated administrator can exploit this by assigning high-value permissions to a group they belong to, inheriting those rights and escalating privileges up to full administrative control.
n8n before 2.25.7 and 2.26.x before 2.26.2 contains an abstract syntax tree (AST) security validator bypass in the Python Code node. An authenticated user with permission to create or modify workflows containing a Python Code node can bypass the validator and access the task executor module namespace. The issue only affects self-hosted instances where the Python Task Runner is enabled; where N8N_BLOCK_RUNNER_ENV_ACCESS is configured to allow it, this can disclose environment variables accessible to the task runner process.
Grav CMS before 2.0.0-beta.2 contains multiple code-execution vulnerabilities. Three unsafe unserialize() calls - in Scheduler\JobQueue, Framework\Cache\Adapter\FileCache, and Session - deserialize untrusted data without restricting allowed classes, enabling PHP object injection and, via a gadget chain, arbitrary code execution where an attacker controls the serialized input. Additionally, InstallCommand's git clone operation passes the branch, url, and path parameters into a shell command without escaping, allowing OS command injection via plugin/theme installation (which requires admin access). A Twig security blocklist bypass (server-side template injection) is also present. The issues are fixed in 2.0.0-beta.2.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability within the debug.pl script that is reachable without authentication. A remote attacker can submit a specially crafted HTTP request containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate input sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges on the underlying system.
Storage Concentrator (SC & SCVM) contains a command injection vulnerability in the ms_service.pl service, which listens on TCP port 9000 by default and accepts custom network packets to perform device actions. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a specially crafted packet containing a malicious payload that is processed without adequate sanitization, resulting in arbitrary command execution with root-level privileges.