Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Amil OneAmil One
VS
NoneNone
Amil One

Amil One

Rua Arquiteto Olavo Redig de Campos 105, São Paulo, 04711-905, BR

Last Update: 12/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.amilone.com.br/
762/1000Fair

A Amil One foi criada para oferecer planos de saúde diferenciados que superem as expectativas dos clientes mais exigentes. Aqui, a exclusividade está em cada detalhe. Trabalhamos para proporcionar aos

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
None

None

420 24th Ave SW, Norman, 73069, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
791/1000Fair

Norman Smile Center is Norman's premier destination for all of your dental needs. Dentists Jamie Belknap, DDS, Donna Sparks, DDS, and Kristen Campbell, DDS, Norman OK, practice a full scope of general and cosmetic dentistry with expertise ranging from porcelain veneers ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:63,304
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Amil One

Amil One

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
None

None

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health, Wellness & Fitness Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amil One in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Health, Wellness & Fitness Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for None in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Amil One (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amil One cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - None (X = Date, Y = Severity)

None cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Amil One

Amil One

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
None

None

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Amil One company and None company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Amil One company and None company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Amil One company and None company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Amil One company and None company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Amil One company and None company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Amil One company and None company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Amil One company and None company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Amil One company and None company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Amil One company and None company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Amil One company and None company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Amil One company and None company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Amil One and None, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Amil One and None, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Amil One or None ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Amil One or None ?
Between Amil One and None, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Amil One and None, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1