Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AmigosAmigos
VS
IKEAIKEA
Amigos

Amigos

N/A

Last Update: 24/04/2026

View Profile

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:82
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
IKEA

IKEA

Olof Palmestraat 1, Delft, Zuid-Holland, NL, 2616

Last Update: 02/06/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://ikea.com/
766/1000Fair

The IKEA vision is to create a better everyday life for the many people. Our business idea is to offer well-designed, functional and affordable, high-quality home furnishing, produced with care for people and the environment. The IKEA Brand unites more than 200.000 co-...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:94,730
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Amigos

Amigos

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
IKEA

IKEA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amigos in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

IKEA has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Amigos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amigos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - IKEA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IKEA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Amigos

Amigos

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
IKEA

IKEA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
IKE1780411817
🔒 Incident : Breach
IKE00291122
🔒 Incident : Breach
IKE201526822

FAQ

Between Amigos company and IKEA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Amigos company and IKEA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Amigos company and IKEA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Amigos company and IKEA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Amigos company and IKEA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Amigos company and IKEA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Amigos company and IKEA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Amigos company and IKEA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Amigos company and IKEA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Amigos company and IKEA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Amigos company and IKEA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Amigos and IKEA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Amigos and IKEA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Amigos or IKEA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Amigos or IKEA ?
Between Amigos and IKEA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Amigos and IKEA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9