Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AM GebiedsontwikkelingAM Gebiedsontwikkeling
VS
SM SupermallsSM Supermalls
AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

Ptolemaeuslaan 80, Utrecht, Utrecht, NL, 3528 BP

Last Update: 20/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.am.nl
758/1000Fair

AM is a leading and socially driven area developer. Conceiving and developing inspiring and sustainable living environments is our passion. We are committed to making impact, because social issues are not abstract tasks, but concrete questions from people. We want to ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:550
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

Mall of Asia Complex, Pasay City, 1300, PH

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
784/1000Fair

The SM Group of companies stands today as an institution, a store, a mall, a bank, a home, a resort, a hotel, and a place to see and experience with the family. One of the core business areas of the SM Group is the Shopping Center Management Corporation, generally ref...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:13,749
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AM Gebiedsontwikkeling in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SM Supermalls in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AM Gebiedsontwikkeling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AM Gebiedsontwikkeling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - SM Supermalls (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SM Supermalls cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
SM Supermalls

SM Supermalls

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and SM Supermalls company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and SM Supermalls company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and SM Supermalls company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and SM Supermalls company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling and SM Supermalls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling and SM Supermalls, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AM Gebiedsontwikkeling or SM Supermalls ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AM Gebiedsontwikkeling or SM Supermalls ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling and SM Supermalls, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling and SM Supermalls, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9