Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AM GebiedsontwikkelingAM Gebiedsontwikkeling
VS
REMAXREMAX
AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

Ptolemaeuslaan 80, Utrecht, Utrecht, NL, 3528 BP

Last Update: 20/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.am.nl
758/1000Fair

AM is a leading and socially driven area developer. Conceiving and developing inspiring and sustainable living environments is our passion. We are committed to making impact, because social issues are not abstract tasks, but concrete questions from people. We want to ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:550
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
REMAX

REMAX

5075 S. Syracuse St., Denver, 80237, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.remax.com
737/1000Moderate

As one of the leading global real estate franchisors, RE/MAX, LLC is a subsidiary of RE/MAX Holdings (NYSE: RMAX) with more than 140,000 agents in almost 9,000 offices and a presence in more than 110 countries and territories. Nobody in the world sells more real estat...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:43,488
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
REMAX

REMAX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AM Gebiedsontwikkeling in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for REMAX in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AM Gebiedsontwikkeling (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AM Gebiedsontwikkeling cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - REMAX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

REMAX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

AM Gebiedsontwikkeling

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
REMAX

REMAX

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
JOHREM1770865850

FAQ

Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and REMAX company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and REMAX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and REMAX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and REMAX company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and REMAX company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and REMAX company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling company and REMAX company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling and REMAX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling and REMAX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AM Gebiedsontwikkeling or REMAX ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AM Gebiedsontwikkeling or REMAX ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling and REMAX, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AM Gebiedsontwikkeling and REMAX, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA