Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AmeyAmey
VS
FerrovialFerrovial
Amey

Amey

10 Furnival Street, London, GB, ED4A 1AB

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://http://www.amey.co.uk
750/1000Fair

We are a leading provider of full life-cycle engineering, operations and decarbonisation solutions, for transport infrastructure and complex facilities. Our purpose is delivering sustainable infrastructure, enhancing life, protecting our shared future. We combine excep...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:7,691
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Ferrovial

Ferrovial

Amsterdam, NL

Last Update: 16/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.ferrovial.com
813/1000Good

Ferrovial is a leading global infrastructure company transforming highways, airports, and energy around the world. Its distinctive integrated business model supports the entire lifecycle of complex projects, from design and financing to construction, operation and maint...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:12,658
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Amey

Amey

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ferrovial

Ferrovial

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amey in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ferrovial in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Amey (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amey cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ferrovial (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ferrovial cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Amey

Amey

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AME15336322
Ferrovial

Ferrovial

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Amey company and Ferrovial company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Amey company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Amey company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Amey company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Amey company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Amey company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Amey company and Ferrovial company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Amey company and Ferrovial company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Amey company and Ferrovial company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Amey company and Ferrovial company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Amey company and Ferrovial company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Amey and Ferrovial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Amey and Ferrovial, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Amey or Ferrovial ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Amey or Ferrovial ?
Between Amey and Ferrovial, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Amey and Ferrovial, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES