Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

クレアフォーム事業部クレアフォーム事業部
VS
WEGWEG
クレアフォーム事業部

クレアフォーム事業部

芝大門 1-1-30 芝NBFタワー3階, 港区, 1050012, JP

Last Update: 01/12/2025

View Profile
751/1000Fair

Creaformは、2002年にレヴィ(カナダ、ケベック州)で設立された3D測定技術および3Dエンジニアリングサービスにおける世界的リーダーです。弊社は、75ヵ国以上で革新的なポータブル3Dスキャンソリューションの開発・製造・販売を行っています。弊社の画期的な技術は、自動車、航空宇宙、製造、消費財、研究および教育、NDT(非破壊検査)、重工業、発電といった幅広い分野で役立っています。

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:23
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
WEG

WEG

Avenida Pref. Waldemar Grubba, 3300, Jaraguá do Sul, 89256-900, BR

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.weg.net
798/1000Fair

Founded in 1961, WEG is a global electro-electronic equipment company, operating in the capital goods sector a with focus on electric motors, gearboxes and drives and controls, energy generation and transformers, electrification products and systems, automation and digi...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:25,034
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
クレアフォーム事業部

クレアフォーム事業部

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
WEG

WEG

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for クレアフォーム事業部 in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for WEG in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - クレアフォーム事業部 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

クレアフォーム事業部 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - WEG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

WEG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
クレアフォーム事業部

クレアフォーム事業部

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
WEG

WEG

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between クレアフォーム事業部 company and WEG company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 company and WEG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 company and WEG company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 company and WEG company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 company and WEG company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 company and WEG company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 company and WEG company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 company and WEG company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 company and WEG company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 company and WEG company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 company and WEG company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 and WEG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 and WEG, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - クレアフォーム事業部 or WEG ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - クレアフォーム事業部 or WEG ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 and WEG, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between クレアフォーム事業部 and WEG, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA