Comparison Overview
American Tower Europe
American Tower Europe
De Ruijterkade 6, Amsterdam, NL, 1013 AA
Last Update: 19/03/2026
Through a global portfolio of digital infrastructure assets and other communications real estate solutions, American Tower enables our partners and customers to keep people and communities connected in a responsible, equitable and sustainable way. With the increasing p...
PT. Indosat Tbk
Jl. Medan Merdeka Barat No. 21 Jakarta 10110, Indonesia, Jakarta Pusat, 10110, ID
Last Update: 19/09/2026
Indosat Ooredoo Hutchison (IDX: ISAT) ("IOH"), are here with our vision to become the most preferred digital telecommunications company of Indonesia. The IOH merger combines two highly complementary businesses between PT Indosat Tbk (“Indosat Ooredoo”) and PT Hutchison ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
American Tower Europe
PT. Indosat Tbk
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for American Tower Europe in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PT. Indosat Tbk in 2026.
Incident History - American Tower Europe (X = Date, Y = Severity)
American Tower Europe cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PT. Indosat Tbk (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PT. Indosat Tbk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
American Tower Europe
PT. Indosat Tbk
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.