Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

American School of WroclawAmerican School of Wroclaw
VS
Dallas Independent School DistrictDallas Independent School District
American School of Wroclaw

American School of Wroclaw

Partynicka 29-37 , Wrocław, 53-020 , PL

Last Update: 28/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.asw.org.pl
770/1000Fair

The American School of Wrocław is an independent nursery, kindergarten, primary school and secondary IB World School serving a multicultural student body since 2011. The professional staff of American School of Wrocław is highly qualified, trained, prepared and monitore...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:59
Subsidiaries:47
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Dallas Independent School District

Dallas Independent School District

9400 N Central Expy, Dallas, 75231, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.dallasisd.org
749/1000Moderate

The Dallas Independent School District is “one of the nation’s fastest improving school districts,” according to the Council of the Great City Schools. With 230+ schools and approximately 130,000+ students, Dallas ISD is home to two of the top public high schools in the...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:16,033
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
American School of Wroclaw

American School of Wroclaw

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Dallas Independent School District

Dallas Independent School District

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American School of Wroclaw in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dallas Independent School District in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - American School of Wroclaw (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American School of Wroclaw cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Dallas Independent School District (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dallas Independent School District cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
American School of Wroclaw

American School of Wroclaw

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Dallas Independent School District

Dallas Independent School District

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DAL12484822

FAQ

Between American School of Wroclaw company and Dallas Independent School District company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between American School of Wroclaw company and Dallas Independent School District company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between American School of Wroclaw company and Dallas Independent School District company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between American School of Wroclaw company and Dallas Independent School District company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between American School of Wroclaw company and Dallas Independent School District company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between American School of Wroclaw company and Dallas Independent School District company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between American School of Wroclaw company and Dallas Independent School District company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between American School of Wroclaw company and Dallas Independent School District company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between American School of Wroclaw company and Dallas Independent School District company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between American School of Wroclaw company and Dallas Independent School District company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between American School of Wroclaw company and Dallas Independent School District company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between American School of Wroclaw and Dallas Independent School District, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between American School of Wroclaw and Dallas Independent School District, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - American School of Wroclaw or Dallas Independent School District ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - American School of Wroclaw or Dallas Independent School District ?
Between American School of Wroclaw and Dallas Independent School District, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between American School of Wroclaw and Dallas Independent School District, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2