Comparison Overview
American Woodmark

American Woodmark
561 Shady Elm Rd, Winchester, 22602, US
Last Update: 07/03/2026
American Woodmark celebrates the creativity in all of us. With over 8,600 employees and more than a dozen brands, we’re one of the nation’s largest cabinet manufacturers. From inspiration to installation, we help people find their unique style and turn their home into a...

Travis Perkins plc
Ryehill House, Rye Hill Close, Northampton, NN5 7UA, GB
Last Update: 19/09/2026
Travis Perkins plc is the UK’s largest distributor of building materials to trade customers. The breadth, reach and scale of our business means we are in a unique position to provide customers with the building materials and tools they need for their projects, when and ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

American Woodmark







Travis Perkins plc






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for American Woodmark in 2026.
Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Travis Perkins plc in 2026.
Incident History - American Woodmark (X = Date, Y = Severity)
American Woodmark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Travis Perkins plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Travis Perkins plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

American Woodmark

Travis Perkins plc
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.