Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

American WoodmarkAmerican Woodmark
VS
KnaufKnauf
American Woodmark

American Woodmark

561 Shady Elm Rd, Winchester, 22602, US

Last Update: 07/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://americanwoodmark.com
735/1000Moderate

American Woodmark celebrates the creativity in all of us. With over 8,600 employees and more than a dozen brands, we’re one of the nation’s largest cabinet manufacturers. From inspiration to installation, we help people find their unique style and turn their home into a...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:3,643
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Knauf

Knauf

Am Bahnhof 7, Iphofen, D-97346, DE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.knauf.com
741/1000Moderate

Everyone sees opportunity differently. Knauf sees opportunity in everyone. Similar to other global businesses, our 41,500 team members in 90 countries across 300 sites provide a huge opportunity for anyone with ambition and energy. Unlike other global businesses, you ...

NAICS:4233
NAICS Definition:Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees:12,476
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
American Woodmark

American Woodmark

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Knauf

Knauf

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Woodmark in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Knauf in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - American Woodmark (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Woodmark cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Knauf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Knauf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
American Woodmark

American Woodmark

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AME439072725
Knauf

Knauf

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
KNA05626722

FAQ

Between American Woodmark company and Knauf company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between American Woodmark company and Knauf company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between American Woodmark company and Knauf company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between American Woodmark company and Knauf company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between American Woodmark company and Knauf company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between American Woodmark company and Knauf company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between American Woodmark company and Knauf company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between American Woodmark company and Knauf company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between American Woodmark company and Knauf company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between American Woodmark company and Knauf company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between American Woodmark company and Knauf company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between American Woodmark and Knauf, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between American Woodmark and Knauf, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - American Woodmark or Knauf ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - American Woodmark or Knauf ?
Between American Woodmark and Knauf, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between American Woodmark and Knauf, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA