Comparison Overview

American Turbocharger Technologies

VS

Caltrax Inc

American Turbocharger Technologies

None
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We provide fast and professional services for operators of 901-5,000 horsepower marine, locomotive and stationary diesel engines. American Turbocharger Technologies remanufactures each turbocharger with integrity and precision to allow our customers the dependability to take care of theirs. With over a combined 200 years of experience in the turbocharger repair business, and a 20,000-square-foot facility located in the center of the world’s largest naval port (Newport News, VA) – we are easily accessible and well-equipped to take on your most difficult challenges!

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 10
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Caltrax Inc

1805 30 Avenue SE, Calgary, Alberta, T2G 4X8, CA
Last Update: 2025-10-28
Between 700 and 749

Caltrax Inc. is the only full service independent railcar repair service facility in western Canada. Caltrax services all types of railcars. We have been in business since 1991. Focused on continuous improvement, our vision is to be a recognized leader in the Railcar Industry and a trusted source for our employees, our customers and our vendors Our mission is to consistently deliver the highest level of quality, safety, service and value to our customers and employees in the safest way possible as a leader in the industry. We consistently strive to improve our quality of business, and facilitate growth and expansion of our repair services. We will always value our customers, our employees, innovative technology, a friendly atmosphere, and management’s commitment to overall excellence. We will maintain high business, ethical, safety and quality standards for the benefit of our customers and employees.

NAICS: 3365
NAICS Definition: Railroad Rolling Stock Manufacturing
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-turbocharger-technologies.jpeg
American Turbocharger Technologies
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caltrax-inc.jpeg
Caltrax Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
American Turbocharger Technologies
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Caltrax Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Turbocharger Technologies in 2025.

Incidents vs Railroad Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caltrax Inc in 2025.

Incident History — American Turbocharger Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Turbocharger Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Caltrax Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caltrax Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-turbocharger-technologies.jpeg
American Turbocharger Technologies
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/caltrax-inc.jpeg
Caltrax Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

American Turbocharger Technologies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Caltrax Inc company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Caltrax Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to American Turbocharger Technologies company.

In the current year, Caltrax Inc company and American Turbocharger Technologies company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Caltrax Inc company nor American Turbocharger Technologies company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Caltrax Inc company nor American Turbocharger Technologies company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Caltrax Inc company nor American Turbocharger Technologies company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither American Turbocharger Technologies company nor Caltrax Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither American Turbocharger Technologies nor Caltrax Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

American Turbocharger Technologies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Caltrax Inc company.

Caltrax Inc company employs more people globally than American Turbocharger Technologies company, reflecting its scale as a Railroad Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither American Turbocharger Technologies nor Caltrax Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither American Turbocharger Technologies nor Caltrax Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither American Turbocharger Technologies nor Caltrax Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither American Turbocharger Technologies nor Caltrax Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither American Turbocharger Technologies nor Caltrax Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither American Turbocharger Technologies nor Caltrax Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H