Comparison Overview
American Tower

American Tower
116 Huntington Avenue, Boston, 02116, US
Last Update: 18/06/2026
At American Tower, our vision of Building a More Connected World reflects our purpose: enabling seamless, secure, and sustainable connectivity that empowers people, businesses, and communities. As a global leader in digital infrastructure, we provide the foundation for ...

Free
16, Rue de la Ville-l'Évêque, Paris, Île-de-France, FR, 75008
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Trublion historique des Télécoms, Free reste un opérateur pas comme les autres. Nous continuons de nous distinguer de nos concurrents par nos produits, par notre politique tarifaire ou encore par le ton employé avec nos abonnés. Cette différence a aussi construit la gr...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

American Tower







Free






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
American Tower has 47.64% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Free in 2026.
Incident History - American Tower (X = Date, Y = Severity)
American Tower cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Free (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Free cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

American Tower

Free
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.