Comparison Overview

American Jazz Museum

VS

The Heckscher Museum of Art

American Jazz Museum

1616 E. 18th Street, Kansas City, MO, 64108, US
Last Update: 2026-01-18

Click the button in our profile to become a member today and follow us on social media for updates on programming, live music, and more! About: The American Jazz Museum celebrates and exhibits the experience of jazz as an original American art form through performance, exhibition, education and research at one of the country’s jazz crossroads – 18th and Vine. The museum explores the history, expression and performance of jazz throughout the entire United States, highlighting the story of jazz in Kansas City, one of the four major centers of the art form in the country. Exhibits showcase the impact and expression of jazz on and through many aspects of American History and culture, particularly African-American history and culture, from film to literature, the fine arts, dance, and pop culture. With its roots in African American culture, jazz is infused in the DNA of America. Since its birth in the early 20th century, jazz history has been analogous to our everyday lives. It has been part of many significant developments, people, events, and social movements in Kansas City and America's history. Its story can help us understand the country, the city, and ourselves in a deeper, more meaningful way. Jazz is an indispensable part of the cultural infrastructure and identity of Kansas City. The American Jazz Museum is a leader in the development of the 18th and Vine Historic Jazz District - a community anchor that encompasses all the enduring possibility to learn more about ourselves and each other through each artifact, program, and performance. For 25 years, the American Jazz Museum has opened its doors to hundreds of thousands of visitors, championing the impact that jazz has on our everyday lives and the enduring possibility to learn more about ourselves and each other through each artifact, program, and performance.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Heckscher Museum of Art

2 Prime Ave, Huntington, New York, 11743, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

At The Heckscher Museum of Art, we believe that experiencing art broadens our understanding of the past, fosters community connections to our present, and creates diverse possibilities for our future. The Heckscher Museum maintains a Collection that includes more than 2,300 works from the sixteenth to the twenty-first century, including European and American painting, sculpture, works on paper, and photography. The Museum was founded in 1920 by Anna and August Heckscher, who donated the Museum building and 185 works of art to the Town of Huntington. Mr. and Mrs. Heckscher envisioned Heckscher Park and the Museum as the center of the community’s cultural, recreational, and social life. Inspired by that vision, the Museum has championed the value of publicly accessible art and arts education for everyone.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-jazz-museum.jpeg
American Jazz Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-heckscher-museum-of-art.jpeg
The Heckscher Museum of Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
American Jazz Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Heckscher Museum of Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for American Jazz Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Heckscher Museum of Art in 2026.

Incident History — American Jazz Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

American Jazz Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Heckscher Museum of Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Heckscher Museum of Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/american-jazz-museum.jpeg
American Jazz Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-heckscher-museum-of-art.jpeg
The Heckscher Museum of Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Heckscher Museum of Art company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to American Jazz Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Heckscher Museum of Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to American Jazz Museum company.

In the current year, The Heckscher Museum of Art company and American Jazz Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art company nor American Jazz Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art company nor American Jazz Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Heckscher Museum of Art company nor American Jazz Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither American Jazz Museum company nor The Heckscher Museum of Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither American Jazz Museum nor The Heckscher Museum of Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither American Jazz Museum company nor The Heckscher Museum of Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

The Heckscher Museum of Art company employs more people globally than American Jazz Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither American Jazz Museum nor The Heckscher Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither American Jazz Museum nor The Heckscher Museum of Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither American Jazz Museum nor The Heckscher Museum of Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither American Jazz Museum nor The Heckscher Museum of Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither American Jazz Museum nor The Heckscher Museum of Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither American Jazz Museum nor The Heckscher Museum of Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N