Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Amergis Healthcare StaffingAmergis Healthcare Staffing
VS
Insight GlobalInsight Global
Amergis Healthcare Staffing

Amergis Healthcare Staffing

7223 Lee Deforest Dr, Columbia, 21046, US

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.amergis.com
695/1000Weak

Proudly emerging from Maxim Healthcare Staffing (established 1988), Amergis reflects our unwavering commitment to connecting people to work that matters. We offer meaningful opportunities for a wide range of healthcare professionals, including nurses, allied health prof...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:5,142
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Insight Global

Insight Global

1224 Hammond Drive, Suite 1500, Atlanta, Georgia, US, 30346

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://insightglobal.com
824/1000Good

Insight Global is an international professional services and staffing company specializing in delivering talent and technical solutions to Fortune 1000 companies across the IT, Non-IT, Healthcare, and Engineering industries. Fueled by staffing and talent experts, Evergr...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:18,664
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Amergis Healthcare Staffing

Amergis Healthcare Staffing

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Insight Global

Insight Global

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amergis Healthcare Staffing in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Insight Global in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Amergis Healthcare Staffing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amergis Healthcare Staffing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Insight Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Insight Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Amergis Healthcare Staffing

Amergis Healthcare Staffing

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
AME433072725
🔒 Incident : Breach
AME321072825
Insight Global

Insight Global

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing company and Insight Global company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing company and Insight Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing company and Insight Global company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing company and Insight Global company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing company and Insight Global company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing company and Insight Global company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing company and Insight Global company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing company and Insight Global company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing company and Insight Global company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing company and Insight Global company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing company and Insight Global company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing and Insight Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing and Insight Global, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Amergis Healthcare Staffing or Insight Global ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Amergis Healthcare Staffing or Insight Global ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing and Insight Global, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Amergis Healthcare Staffing and Insight Global, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-71194
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.2, the mDNS handler performs pool-blind lookups when resolving record queries and NOTIFY requests. When two zones with the same name exist across different pools, the lookup fails with a deterministic error, causing the handler to return REFUSED for all DNS queries through that path. The _handle_notify path is exploitable via a single unauthenticated UDP packet. This is independently reachable through the cross-tenant zone overlap described in a different recent CVE, and also affects legitimate same-tenant cross-pool configurations. BIND9 views do not mitigate this issue as mDNS is a shared service upstream of any view configuration.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-71193
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Designate before 22.0.1, zone creation checks (_is_subzone, _is_superzone, and the duplicate-zone DB constraint) are scoped to the target pool only. An authenticated user can bypass these checks by scheduling a zone to a different pool via the AttributeFilter scheduler, creating an overlapping zone that conflicts with another tenant's zone. This enables cross-tenant DNS hijack (redirecting traffic to attacker-controlled IPs) and DNS denial of service (NODATA responses). Exploitation requires a multi-pool deployment with AttributeFilter enabled in scheduler_filters, which is a non-default but documented and supported configuration for self-service tiering.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-49481
SUMMARY

UpSnap is a wake on lan web app. Versions prior to 5.4.0 have an OS command injection vulnerability in the UpSnap’s device management functionality due to the presence of unsafe shell command template interpolation using the ip and the mac fields. User-controlled values can be inserted into the wake_cmd and shutdown_cmd templates and executed via /bin/sh -c (Linux) or cmd /C (Windows) without sanitization, resulting in an authenticated Remote Code Execution (RCE). A low-privileged user with permission to create or edit devices can execute arbitrary operating system commands on the UpSnap hosted server. Version 5.4.0 patches the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.1
CVE-2026-47718
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. When `secureEnabled=true`, FUXA `1.3.0-2773` still allows guest and invalid-token requests to read project, alarms, and scheduler APIs. Version 1.3.1 fixes this issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47717
SUMMARY

FUXA is a web-based Process Visualization (SCADA/HMI/Dashboard) software. In fuxa-server version 1.3.0, the GET /api/project endpoint exposes sensitive project configuration data to guest-context requests even when secureEnabled is enabled. Version 1.3.1 fixes the issue.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-12
UPDATED
Date2026-08-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9