Comparison Overview

Amentum

VS

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

Amentum

4800 Westfields Blvd, Chantilly, Virginia, 20151, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.amentum.com

Amentum is a global leader in advanced engineering and innovative technology solutions, trusted by the United States and its allies to address their most significant and complex challenges in science, security and sustainability. Our people apply undaunted curiosity, relentless ambition and boundless imagination to challenge convention and drive progress. Our commitments are underpinned by the belief that safety, inclusion and well-being are integral to success. Headquartered in Chantilly, Virginia, we have more than 53,000 employees in approximately 80 countries across all 7 continents.

NAICS: 336414
NAICS Definition: Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees: 34,277
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Careers/

We are NAVSEA. The Force Behind the Fleet. Join us and become part of a mission-driven team, at one of the best places to work in the federal government. This NAVSEA LinkedIn page is all about connecting with talented individuals ready to make a difference through a rewarding career with us. We share exciting job opportunities, recruitment events, highlight the NAVSEA mission, and show you how you can help support our warfighters and contribute to the Navy’s broader goals. When you join NAVSEA, you're joining a dynamic team committed to advancing naval capabilities. Whether you're an engineer, program manager, analyst, or IT professional, your work will directly impact the safety and success of our sailors, ensuring the Navy stays at the forefront of global maritime strength.

NAICS: 336
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 23,137
Subsidiaries: 16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amentumcorp.jpeg
Amentum
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/navseacareers.jpeg
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Amentum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amentum in 2025.

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers in 2025.

Incident History — Amentum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amentum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amentumcorp.jpeg
Amentum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/navseacareers.jpeg
Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers
Incidents

FAQ

Amentum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Amentum company has not reported any.

In the current year, Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company and Amentum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company nor Amentum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company nor Amentum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Amentum company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Amentum company nor Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Amentum nor Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Amentum company.

Amentum company employs more people globally than Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers company, reflecting its scale as a Defense and Space Manufacturing.

Neither Amentum nor Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Amentum nor Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Amentum nor Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Amentum nor Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Amentum nor Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Amentum nor Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) Careers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References