Comparison Overview

AMD

VS

Lam Research

AMD

2485 Augustine Drive, Santa Clara, California, US, 95054
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 800 and 849

We care deeply about transforming lives with AMD technology to enrich our industry, our communities, and the world. Our mission is to build great products that accelerate next-generation computing experiences – the building blocks for the data center, artificial intelligence, PCs, gaming and embedded. Underpinning our mission is the AMD culture. We push the limits of innovation to solve the world’s most important challenges. We strive for execution excellence while being direct, humble, collaborative, and inclusive of diverse perspectives. AMD together we advance_

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 49,754
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Lam Research

4650 Cushing Parkway, Fremont, CA, 94538, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 800 and 849

Lam Research Corp. (NASDAQ:LRCX) At Lam Research, we create equipment that drives technological advancements in the semiconductor industry. Our innovative solutions enable chipmakers to power progress in nearly all aspects of modern life, and it takes each member of our team to make it possible. Across our organization, our employees come to work and change the world. We take on the toughest challenges with precision and accuracy. We push for the next big semiconductor breakthrough. We lead the way in one of the most critical and fast-moving industries on the planet. And we do it together, with deep connections and limitless collaboration. We take on the toughest challenges with precision and accuracy. We push for the next big semiconductor breakthrough. We lead the way in one of the most critical and fast-moving industries on the planet. And we do it together, with deep connections and limitless collaboration. The impact we have on the world is made possible by focusing on our people. We recognize and celebrate our teams’ achievements. We strive to create an inclusive and diverse culture where everyone’s contribution and voice has value. We evaluate and evolve our offerings, so our people receive the support and empowerment to do meaningful things for their lives, careers, and communities. Because at Lam, we believe that when people are the priority and they’re inspired to unleash the power of innovation for a better world together, anything is possible. Ready to help define the future of technology? Join us: www.lamresearch.com/careers

NAICS: 3344
NAICS Definition: Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees: 14,671
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amd.jpeg
AMD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lam-research.jpeg
Lam Research
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
AMD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Lam Research
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

AMD has 25.0% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lam Research in 2025.

Incident History — AMD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Lam Research (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lam Research cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amd.jpeg
AMD
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Local (Admin-Privileged Hypervisor), Memory Manipulation
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/lam-research.jpeg
Lam Research
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Lam Research company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AMD company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

AMD company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Lam Research company has not reported any.

In the current year, AMD company has reported more cyber incidents than Lam Research company.

AMD company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Lam Research company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Lam Research company nor AMD company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Lam Research company nor AMD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

AMD company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Lam Research company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither AMD nor Lam Research holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither AMD company nor Lam Research company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

AMD company employs more people globally than Lam Research company, reflecting its scale as a Semiconductor Manufacturing.

Neither AMD nor Lam Research holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither AMD nor Lam Research holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither AMD nor Lam Research holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither AMD nor Lam Research holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither AMD nor Lam Research holds HIPAA certification.

Neither AMD nor Lam Research holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N