Comparison Overview
AMD Enterprise

AMD Enterprise
N/A
Last Update: 28/04/2026
AMD helps enterprises accelerate AI transformation with trusted, high-performance, and adaptive computing solutions. Our technologies are built for IT leaders who need protected, efficient, and future-ready systems that scale across the enterprise. With AMD PRO techno...

Renesas Electronics
TOYOSU FORESIA, 3-2-24, Koto-ku, Toyosu, 135-0061, JP
Last Update: 05/04/2026
Renesas is an embedded semiconductor solution provider driven by its Purpose ‘To Make Our Lives Easier.’ As the industry’s leading expert in embedded processing with unmatched quality and system-level know-how, we have evolved to provide scalable and comprehensive semic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AMD Enterprise







Renesas Electronics






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AMD Enterprise in 2026.
Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Renesas Electronics in 2026.
Incident History - AMD Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AMD Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Renesas Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Renesas Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AMD Enterprise

Renesas Electronics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.
A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.