Comparison Overview
AMD Data Center

AMD Data Center
N/A
Last Update: 24/03/2026
Advanced data centers, hyperscale clouds, and supercomputers around the world run on AMD. Together, with our partners, we are redefining performance, efficiency, and scalability for modern data centers worldwide. We care deeply about transforming lives with AMD technolo...

GlobalFoundries
400 Stone Break Road Extension, Malta, 12020, US
Last Update: 13/09/2026
GlobalFoundries (GF) is one of the world’s leading semiconductor manufacturers. GF is redefining innovation and semiconductor manufacturing by developing and delivering feature-rich process technology solutions that provide leadership performance in pervasive high growt...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AMD Data Center







GlobalFoundries






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for AMD Data Center in 2026.
Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for GlobalFoundries in 2026.
Incident History - AMD Data Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AMD Data Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - GlobalFoundries (X = Date, Y = Severity)
GlobalFoundries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AMD Data Center

GlobalFoundries
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.