Comparison Overview

Ambius United Kingdom

VS

ABM Industries

Ambius United Kingdom

Rentokil Initial, Crawley, West Sussex, RH10 9PY, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Ambius us the world's largest provider of plants, replica foliage and flowers for commercial environments. We not only specialise in designing, installing and servicing acclimatised, interior plants and pots, but also offer additional services such as exterior landscaping, flowers, artificial plants, Christmas trees and decorations and stunning rental art for commercial businesses.

NAICS: 5612
NAICS Definition: Facilities Support Services
Employees: 11,638
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

ABM Industries

1 Liberty St, None, New York, None, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

ABM is one of the world’s largest providers of integrated facility, engineering, and infrastructure solutions. Every day, our over 100,000 team members deliver essential services that make spaces cleaner, safer, and efficient, enhancing the overall occupant experience. ABM serves a wide range of market sectors including commercial real estate, aviation, education, mission critical, and manufacturing and distribution. With over $8 billion in annual revenue and a blue-chip client base, ABM delivers innovative technologies and sustainable solutions that enhance facilities and empower clients to achieve their goals. Committed to creating smarter, more connected spaces, ABM is investing in the future to meet evolving challenges and build a healthier, thriving world. ABM: Driving possibility, together. For more information, visit www.ABM.com

NAICS: 5612
NAICS Definition: Facilities Support Services
Employees: 30,519
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambius-united-kingdom.jpeg
Ambius United Kingdom
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abm-industries.jpeg
ABM Industries
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ambius United Kingdom
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ABM Industries
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ambius United Kingdom in 2025.

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABM Industries in 2025.

Incident History — Ambius United Kingdom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ambius United Kingdom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ABM Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ABM Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambius-united-kingdom.jpeg
Ambius United Kingdom
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2020
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/abm-industries.jpeg
ABM Industries
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2014
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Ambius United Kingdom company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ABM Industries company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

ABM Industries company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Ambius United Kingdom company.

In the current year, ABM Industries company and Ambius United Kingdom company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ABM Industries company nor Ambius United Kingdom company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both ABM Industries company and Ambius United Kingdom company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Neither ABM Industries company nor Ambius United Kingdom company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ambius United Kingdom company nor ABM Industries company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ambius United Kingdom nor ABM Industries holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ambius United Kingdom company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ABM Industries company.

ABM Industries company employs more people globally than Ambius United Kingdom company, reflecting its scale as a Facilities Services.

Neither Ambius United Kingdom nor ABM Industries holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ambius United Kingdom nor ABM Industries holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ambius United Kingdom nor ABM Industries holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ambius United Kingdom nor ABM Industries holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ambius United Kingdom nor ABM Industries holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ambius United Kingdom nor ABM Industries holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H