Comparison Overview

Ambev

VS

Sigma

Ambev

São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, BR, 04530-001
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Hey there! Welcome. Here at Ambev, there are lots of people and amazing projects beyond our labels! Let’s talk about that. We believe that having a big dream requires just the same effort as having a small one. That is why our big dream began back in the 1880s, with a team determined to make things happen and, mainly, be present in the most important and remarkable moments for each one of you: from the barley fields to your glass, at the best concerts, soccer games, social gatherings, or even that relaxing moment after a long day of work. Throughout our journey, we succeeded but also made mistakes, found opportunities in a continuous learning process, took up issues, unlearned, relearned and evolved to be where we stand today. We are thousands of people in love with what we do, moved by the goal of bringing people together for a better world. Beer is our great passion, as well as the people involved in our ecosystem. But our brands are not all about us. We also have incredible projects which help the world become a better place for everyone. Some examples are Ambev VOA, our bottled water AMA, our goal to end our plastic pollution by 2025, shared economy and water saving projects, and moreover. We believe that, along with society, we can make the world a better place to live in. Therefore, we encourage new attitudes: responsible consumption and environmental preservation, two causes we support and are much more than a project. It’s our way to think and act. Everything we do pursues respect and collaboration to reach sustainable attitude. Our commitment is with you! Nice meeting you, we are Ambev and we go #BeyondLabels. Want to be part of our team? Find our opportunities at ambev.com.br/carreiras/trabalhe-conosco 😊 Our terms of use: http://www.ambev.com.br/termos-de-uso

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 72,825
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sigma

MX, 66254
Last Update: 2025-11-27

We are a global food company dedicated to bringing local favorite foods to communities everywhere. Within 17 countries, we offer quality branded food at a range of price points and across diverse categories. We're a company dedicated to the production, distribution and sales of refrigerated and frozen products such as cold meats, dry meats, cheese, yogurt, prepared meals and beverages. We have a strong diversified portfolio of well-positioned brands that market in the countries where we participate. We operate in 64 production plants, serving more than 670,000 customers in North, Central, South America, the Caribbean and Europe. We strive for excellence in everything we do. We're passionate about innovation and our consumers; we're committed in bringing them the best quality and taste in every product. The passion and effort we invest in our work is the reason we're on the road to success.

NAICS: 722
NAICS Definition: Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees: 12,315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambev.jpeg
Ambev
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigma-alimentos.jpeg
Sigma
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ambev
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sigma
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ambev in 2025.

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sigma in 2025.

Incident History — Ambev (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ambev cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sigma (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sigma cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ambev.jpeg
Ambev
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sigma-alimentos.jpeg
Sigma
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ambev company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sigma company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sigma company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ambev company.

In the current year, Sigma company and Ambev company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sigma company nor Ambev company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sigma company nor Ambev company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sigma company nor Ambev company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ambev company nor Sigma company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ambev nor Sigma holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Ambev company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sigma company.

Ambev company employs more people globally than Sigma company, reflecting its scale as a Food and Beverage Services.

Neither Ambev nor Sigma holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ambev nor Sigma holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ambev nor Sigma holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ambev nor Sigma holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ambev nor Sigma holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ambev nor Sigma holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H