Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Amazon Quick

Amazon Quick Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

amazon.com

Quick answers your questions and turns those answers into actions using agentic teammates for research, business insights, and automation.


Amazon Quick A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Amazon Quick
Company Information
Website:https://aws.amazon.com/quick/
Employees number:None
Number of followers:412
NAICS:513
Industry Type:Technology, Information and Internet
Homepage:amazon.com
Amazon Quick Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 750 and 799
logo
Amazon QuickTechnology, Information and Internet
Updated:
14/05/2026
751/1000
Fair
Baa
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
Amazon Quick Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
Amazon QuickTechnology, Information and Internet
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

Amazon Quick
Amazon QuickFair
Current Score
751Baa (FAIR)
01000
1 incidents
-17 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
751Before Incident
JUNE 2026
751Before Incident
MAY 2026
751Before Incident
APRIL 2026
750Before Incident
MARCH 2026
767Before Incident
Vulnerability
04 Mar 2026Amazon Quick
Amazon: Amazon Quick Flaw Exposed Restricted AI Chat Agents to Unauthorized Users

Amazon Quick AI Flaw Exposed Backdoor in Frontend-Only Permission Controls

750After Incident
CRITICAL-17
AMA1778761660
Amazon Quick AI Flaw Exposed Backdoor in Frontend-Only Permission Controls Security researchers uncovered a critical vulnerability in Amazon QuickSight, Amazon’s AI-driven business intelligence platform, where custom permission settings designed to block AI chat agents for specific users were enforced only in the frontend leaving the backend API fully accessible. The flaw, a CWE-862 missing authorization bug, allowed any user with a basic account to bypass UI restrictions by sending direct HTTP requests to the Chat Agent API. Despite the frontend graying out chat options, a simple POST request to `https://quicksight.<region>.amazonaws.com/chat-agent` with a JSON payload could still retrieve AI-generated responses even for prompts like "Tell me about mangoes" regardless of intended restrictions. ### Key Details of the Vulnerability - Frontend-Only Enforcement: The UI suggested AI chat was disabled, but the API lacked server-side validation. - Default AI Agent Exposure: AWS automatically provisions a generic AI chat agent upon service activation, expanding the attack surface even when admins attempted to disable AI features. - No Cross-Account Leakage: The flaw was contained within the same AWS account, preventing access to other tenants. - Unauthorized Data Access: Users could extract insights from restricted datasets, violating confidentiality policies. - Shadow AI Usage: Covert interactions with AI agents undermined audit trails and governance controls. - Compliance Risks: Organizations under GDPR, HIPAA, or other regulations faced potential violations due to ineffective restrictions. ### AWS Response & Timeline - Disclosure: Fog Security reported the issue via HackerOne on March 4, 2026. - Fix Deployment: AWS implemented a regional patch by March 11 and completed a global rollout by March 12, after which unauthorized API calls returned a 401 Unauthorized response. - AWS Rating: Despite the fix, AWS classified the vulnerability as "none" and issued no public advisory, leaving many customers unaware their controls had been ineffective for over a week. The incident highlights a persistent challenge in AI-enabled cloud platforms: security controls must be enforced consistently across both UI and API layers. As AI agents become more embedded in SaaS offerings, reliance on frontend restrictions alone creates dangerous blind spots.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Vulnerability Exploitation
IMPACT
Data Compromised: Insights from restricted datasetsSystems Affected: Amazon QuickSight Chat Agent APIOperational Impact: Violation of confidentiality policies, undermined audit trails and governance controlsBrand Reputation Impact: Potential compliance risks and loss of trust in security controlsLegal Liabilities: Potential violations under GDPR, HIPAA, or other regulations
DATA BREACH
Type Of Data Compromised: Business insights from restricted datasetsSensitivity Of Data: Confidential (potentially regulated under GDPR/HIPAA)
FEBRUARY 2026
767Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
767Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
767Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
767Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
767Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
767Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
767Before Incident

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for Amazon Quick ?
?
What was Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on Amazon Quick's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with Amazon Quick ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view Amazon Quick's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?