Comparison Overview
Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Amazon Web Services (AWS)
410 Terry Ave N, Seattle, 98019, US
Last Update: 06/08/2026
Launched in 2006, Amazon Web Services (AWS) began exposing key infrastructure services to businesses in the form of web services -- now widely known as cloud computing. The ultimate benefit of cloud computing, and AWS, is the ability to leverage a new business model and...

Hitachi
1-6-6, Marunouchi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, Japan, JP, 100-8280
Last Update: 30/03/2026
For over 100 years, Hitachi has been committed to developing innovations that improve lives. Today, this means creating superior technology and products that balance environment, well-being, and economic growth. We integrate IT, operational technology (OT), and produc...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Amazon Web Services (AWS)







Hitachi






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Amazon Web Services (AWS) has 1454.05% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Hitachi in 2026.
Incident History - Amazon Web Services (AWS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Amazon Web Services (AWS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Hitachi (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Hitachi cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Hitachi
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.
A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.
A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service
PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.