Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Alup KompressorenAlup Kompressoren
VS
John DeereJohn Deere
Alup Kompressoren

Alup Kompressoren

Keplerstraße 19, Reutlingen, Baden-Württemberg, 72762, DE

Last Update: 18/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.alup.com
744/1000Moderate

From consulting to planning and implementation - 100 years of experience with compressed air make us experts in this field. Von der Beratung zur Planung und Umsetzung – 100 Jahre Erfahrung mit Druckluft machen uns zum Experten auf diesem Gebiet.

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:58
Subsidiaries:49
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
John Deere

John Deere

Moline, 61265, US

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.deere.com/AboutUs
823/1000Good

It doesn’t matter if you’ve never driven a tractor, mowed a lawn, or operated a dozer. With John Deere’s role in helping produce food, fiber, fuel, and infrastructure, we work for every single person on the planet. It all started nearly 200 years ago with a steel plow...

NAICS:333
NAICS Definition:Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:53,435
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Alup Kompressoren

Alup Kompressoren

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
John Deere

John Deere

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Alup Kompressoren in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for John Deere in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Alup Kompressoren (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Alup Kompressoren cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - John Deere (X = Date, Y = Severity)

John Deere cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Alup Kompressoren

Alup Kompressoren

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
John Deere

John Deere

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Alup Kompressoren company and John Deere company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Alup Kompressoren company and John Deere company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Alup Kompressoren company and John Deere company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Alup Kompressoren company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Alup Kompressoren company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Alup Kompressoren company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Alup Kompressoren company and John Deere company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Alup Kompressoren company and John Deere company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Alup Kompressoren company and John Deere company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Alup Kompressoren company and John Deere company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Alup Kompressoren company and John Deere company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Alup Kompressoren and John Deere, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Alup Kompressoren and John Deere, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Alup Kompressoren or John Deere ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Alup Kompressoren or John Deere ?
Between Alup Kompressoren and John Deere, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Alup Kompressoren and John Deere, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94057
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1 allows SMTP smuggling in which the received message does not match any sent message, and instead depends on crafted data sent after a rejection during DATA processing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94056
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, allows attackers to read certain uninitialized data from stack memory.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94055
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when certain non-default TLS settings are used with GnuTLS, has a use-after-free.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-94054
SUMMARY

Exim before 4.100.1, when Proxy-Protocol is used with an attacker-controlled proxy, has an out-of-bounds write.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-93993
SUMMARY

Mistral Vibe before 2.25.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the worktree creation process that executes git hooks before trust validation. Attackers can supply a repository with a crafted post-checkout hook that executes arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of the user running Vibe.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-19
UPDATED
Date2026-09-19
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8