Comparison Overview
Altus Intervention

Altus Intervention
Lagerveien 30, Stavanger, 4033, NO
Last Update: 10/02/2026
In 2023 Baker Hughes completed the acquisition of Altus Intervention. However, the journey doesn’t end here. Join us on the Baker Hughes LinkedIn page, where we continue to share stories about our innovative technologies and the people shaping the future of energy. ht...

Petrobras
Avenida República do Chile, n. 65, Centro, Rio de Janeiro, 20031-912, BR
Last Update: 02/07/2026
Nosso propósito é prover energia que assegure prosperidade de forma ética, justa, segura e competitiva. Queremos ser a melhor empresa diversificada e integrada de energia na geração de valor, construindo um mundo mais sustentável, conciliando o foco em óleo e gás com a ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Altus Intervention







Petrobras






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Altus Intervention in 2026.
Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Petrobras in 2026.
Incident History - Altus Intervention (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Altus Intervention cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Petrobras (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Petrobras cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Altus Intervention

Petrobras
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.
Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.